11 ms·
They addressed that in the article that you're commenting on but didn't read.
by DontBeADick 12y ago
They addressed that in the article that you're commenting on but didn't read.
- hemancuso 12y agoWell that's not fair. The "occlusion mask" is referenced in a patent application, but basically is just a LCD that blocks out light that sits in front of your eye. re: fullscreen google glass, at best.
- ctdonath 12y agoWell, that's exactly the point: an anti-display which lets through what parts of reality the system wants you to see, and blocks light from what it wants you to not see - so another display can render something to fill in the blocked-out areas. Rather than the "ghosting" of putting an elephant over your hand, with the light of both being added, the LCD acts as a dynamic precision cutout shutter, blocking the light from where the elephant would be and letting another display fill in _all_ the light you'd expect from that visual addition.