5 ms·
That would get translated into (s="a" and x=2) or true There is an implicit else.
by mccosmos 12y ago
That would get translated into
(s="a" and x=2) or true
There is an implicit else.
- ajuc 12y agoIsn't it a little useless? I would think if would work better if it was transformed into implication. if (p) q would be (p => q) and if p q else r would be (p=>q) and (~p => r) Anyway, not my language.