9 ms·
If you read the story, it mentions digging dirt on Sarah's family. Family includes children. >> But what is wrong with threatening a woman's children? Clearly
by unohoo 12y ago
If you read the story, it mentions digging dirt on Sarah's family. Family includes children.
>> But what is wrong with threatening a woman's children?
Clearly you dont have children. If you dont see anything wrong with this notion, having a thoughtful discussion with you is a moot point. Do you work for uber ?
- pravda 12y ago>If you read the story, it mentions digging dirt on Sarah's family. Family includes children. Digging dirt is not threatening. Neither Sarah nor her children were threatened and it is dishonest and slimy to suggest otherwise. >Clearly you dont have children. I believe that truth and justice are the highest values. If threatening a woman's children is what brings her to conduct herself in a moral manner, then we can say it is good. Sometimes the ends justify the means. And the same applies to men, of course. But it's a moot point -- only the government can legally threaten someone's children.