7 ms·
If you read that document carefully, you can see that the EFF edited one of passages that they quoted and did not mention their edit, which is a big no-no. The
by Curmudgel 12y ago
If you read that document carefully, you can see that the EFF edited one of passages that they quoted and did not mention their edit, which is a big no-no. The original letter says:
(this exact number has been selected for a specific reason,
it has definite practical significant.
which the EFF quoted as
(this exact number has been selected for a specific reason,
it has definite practical significance).
- dllthomas 12y agoI expect that was accidental, but I agree it should be fixed (either corrected in brackets, or the original with a [sic]).