> Even worse than the problem of uncommon concepts as monads Just go ahead and learn the typeclass hierarchy and such-- it really is quite a useful higher leve

> Even worse than the problem of uncommon concepts as monads Just go ahead and learn the typeclass hierarchy and such-- it really is quite a useful higher level of abstraction in whatever language you choose. And it definitely will enter the mainstream (even more than is already has [Swift, Scala & C# all have monadic constructs]). > Haskell's memory footprint is extremely hard to reason about. And you'd probably want to also throw runtime in there as well. I think this is relative-- it's not "extremely hard" for everyone. Also, many structured programmers found object orientation "extremely hard" but somehow the industry managed to progress through that era.