8 ms·
I really like your idea of the 4-part abstraction. Still… Your library really is not "that" easy to use. I'm currently working on my own library using libuv, h
by b3tta 12y ago
I really like your idea of the 4-part abstraction. Still… Your library really is not "that" easy to use.
I'm currently working on my own library using libuv, http-parser, nghttp2 and wslay, which is very similiar in it's use to node.js. As you might guess a echo server is therefore only about 15 lines of code, but about as performant as your framework. The downsite is that it's not as flexible due to the missing "4-part abtraction" (really… an excellent idea).
That's why your release somehow saddens me: When I'm going to release my framework to the public, it might be pretty good for cross platform apps etc. compared to others, but it will never ever be as popular as yours. Heck… I don't even have 10 twitter followers.
- rphillips 12y agois it open source?
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- Igglyboo 12y agoCare to show us what you've got instead of just saying how much better it is than Proxygen? Also Facebook is a group of people so saying "your" doesn't really sound right.
- b3tta 12y agoI'm sorry… English is not my native tongue. But I'm learning fast. :) In no way I intended to say that my framework is better overall, but I do think it's better suited for simple things, like apps. In fact, I think I will integrate something like their "four-part abstraction", because I really think this is a great idea.