9 ms·
We keep having to tell people that having no ruleRs doesn't mean having no ruleS. If by "no system" you mean "freedom", that's fine with me. Sure, we need rules
by authatheist 12y ago
We keep having to tell people that having no ruleRs doesn't mean having no ruleS. If by "no system" you mean "freedom", that's fine with me. Sure, we need rules and negative consequences for breaking them, but that does not require rulers.
- loup-vaillant 12y agoYou're different from that straw-man libertarian I once met. "Freedom" is an ideal, not a mechanism. The question is, which mechanism promotes freedom? Personally, I currently bet on democracy. Not representative governments, but democracy, which we don't currently have. Like in ancient Athens, where people where chosen by random trial, instead of elections. (Plus a host of checks and balances, before during, and after whatever short mandate was given.)
- authatheist 12y agoA straw-man libertarian you met? Freedom just means that no one forcefully intervenes in your life, assuming that you're not harming anyone yourself, of course. Demoracy is just mob rule. You'll find it unacceptable any time you're being forced to comply with what the majority wants. You know most people are idiots, right? You don't want idiots making decisions that affect your life. Does that help?