5 ms·
> still allow companies like Ranbaxy The same we still allowed companies like Bayer to do this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contaminated_haemophilia_blood_pro
by neindanke 12y ago
> still allow companies like Ranbaxy
The same we still allowed companies like Bayer to do this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contaminated_haemophilia_blood_products http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contaminated_haemophilia_blood_...
The same we still allowed companies like GlaxoSmithKline to do this:
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-29274822 http://www.bbc.com/news/business-29274822
> Ranbaxy - how can people there sleep at night.
The FDA, Bayer, Pfizer, Ranbaxy, big pharma will always sleep well. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2006/08/05/bayer-sells-aids-infected-drug-banned-in-us-in-europe-asia.aspx http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2006/08/0...
- me_again 12y agoThere have definitely been ethical lapses at many large pharma companies. Ranbaxy seems in a different class altogether, though. Incidentally, Mercola.com is absolutely not a reliable source of medical information. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Mercola http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Mercola. Ironically, Dr Mercola has also suggested that HIV is not the cause of AIDS.
- CaptainZapp 12y agoIn addition to what me_again said I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that Mercola is one of the most prominent and virulent anti-vaxxers around. Not sure if you're making your case with a link to his site.