5 ms·
Does anyone know how they justify this type of violent entrance for a non-violent offender?
by thornofmight 12y ago
Does anyone know how they justify this type of violent entrance for a non-violent offender?
- mikeash 12y agoYou never know, he might grab a gun and start shooting if you give him a chance. Not saying it's right, but I think that's the reasoning.
- scott_karana 12y agoAnd that's why all police officers are already armed with pistols. A no-knock warrant with holstered pistols would be entirely reasonable in a residential, non-violent crime conviction, don't you think? (Well, I would debate the no-knock part :)
- chc 12y agoMany nonviolent crimes are commonly associated with potential for violence. For example, selling meth is not a violent act, but betting that a meth dealer is a level-headed pacifist is not a very safe wager. (I am not really agreeing with the indiscriminate use of violence out there — just explaining the most logical rationale I've heard.)
- mcherm 12y agoThey don't justify it. They just do it.
- rasz_pl 12y agoRaging hardon from all the adrenaline gushing in while storming the castle playing G.I. Joes with people lives - thats the justification.
- tripzilch 12y ago> Does anyone know how they justify this type of violent entrance for a non-violent offender? With the stick.