5 ms·
> That the language is less safe? Not necessarily. > And haskell has extensible records, they are just a library like anything else: And OCaml has monads, t
by methodology 12y ago
> That the language is less safe?
Not necessarily.
> And haskell has extensible records, they are just a library like anything else:
And OCaml has monads, they are just a library like else.
- dllthomas 12y agoMonads are arguably a library in Haskell, too... though one the standard guarantees is present, exposed by the Prelude, and relied on by a lot of code.
- imanaccount247 12y ago>Not necessarily. Then what? You made the vague statement, make it not vague. >And OCaml has monads, they are just a library like else. And? I did not claim ocaml lacks monads. You claimed haskell lacks extensible records. You do understand that my post was a direct reply to what you said right? Not just some random things I felt like saying for no particular reason.