4 ms·
You wouldn't want to use MD5 specifically because it would take up 32 characters of your message, but a simpler checksum might work.
by inigoesdr 12y ago
You wouldn't want to use MD5 specifically because it would take up 32 characters of your message, but a simpler checksum might work.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- laumars 12y agoMD5 was more a proof of concept than a design specification. However 32 characters is only 1/5 of an SMS so it's not beyond the realms of a practical (albeit lazy) fix. Ideally though, you'd be right that something more concise would be preferable.