4 ms·
They should really accept a hash of your email/username to lookup. Then we can an idea of if we've been pwned without giving additional information if we haven'
by kevinoconnor7 12y ago
They should really accept a hash of your email/username to lookup. Then we can an idea of if we've been pwned without giving additional information if we haven't been.
- jdludlow 12y agoI'm not sure how that would help. They would have to generate a matching hash on their end, giving them a lookup table to work backwards from hash to email address. Now if they wanted to supply a list of hashes to the public, then you could check your own without knowing any of the other addresses used to generate the remaining hashes.
- kevinoconnor7 12y agoYes, but they would already have your e-mail address anyway. Lookup by hash precludes the case where you're giving them information they didn't already have.
- bitJericho 12y agoBut you're still feeding into the "this is a good working address" and "this is a security newb" email lists.
- jdludlow 12y agoTrue. I was more referring to it being a confirmation that this is an email address that anyone cares about. If I wanted to be truly malicious I'd have my online checker return a "Nope, you're all good" and then add that email address to the short list of accounts to go after.