At no point did I touch on morality or ethics. I do not know why you think that I did so. > I agree with you that experimentation is futile in the absence of

At no point did I touch on morality or ethics. I do not know why you think that I did so. > I agree with you that experimentation is futile in the absence of ethics. I do not agree with that. -------- Dictionary.reference.com: > useful: being of use or service; serving some purpose; advantageous, helpful, or of good effect > good: having admirable, pleasing, superior, or positive qualities; not negative, bad or mediocre I urge you to reevaluate your understanding of the words "good" and "useful". Don't you understand that I'm not talking about morality?