7 ms·

You left out Squarespace - whose site editor is amazing. Was this on purpose or just an accidental ommission?

• steve-benjamins 12y ago
  Not sure I understand? The article is an in-depth look at Weebly. The bad examples are meant to show how easily a website builder's interface can get ugly. Squarespace wasn't included as a bad example because it has an excellent interface. In fact Squarespace and Weebly are the only website builders I've given a perfect score to in my website builders guide.
  • kipple 12y ago
    How do you feel about Webflow? I haven't used it personally but from what I've seen (watching over shoulders) it is more technical than most builders but very solid. The interface actually reminds me of Weebly, like expert-mode Weebly.
    • steve-benjamins 12y ago
      Unfortunately I haven't spent enough time in Webflow yet to say. But it seems thoughtfully designed. I'll have to do a review of it soon!
      • kipple 12y ago
        That's very fair. I look forward to it! I enjoy your reviews so far, the trend of legitimately useful sitebuilders is interesting. I yearn for a return of the geocities days, when everyone was pumping out lame websites instead of social network profiles.