I haven't read that philosophical masterpiece that far. This is indeed a very innovative definition this guy has devised. So a person who causes losses to other

I haven't read that philosophical masterpiece that far. This is indeed a very innovative definition this guy has devised. So a person who causes losses to others while her or himself gaining, like a criminal for instance, is not stupid by definition? Sadly most other common definitions are a little different: http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=stupid http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=stupid