6 ms·
"I think you're not using the author's definition of "stupid" " The author does not offer one.
by onreact-com 17y ago
"I think you're not using the author's definition of "stupid" "
The author does not offer one.
- maggit 17y agoHmm... Did you consider the one featured rather prominently in a box under the heading "The third (and golden) basic law"? > A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses.
- onreact-com 17y agoI haven't read that philosophical masterpiece that far. This is indeed a very innovative definition this guy has devised. So a person who causes losses to others while her or himself gaining, like a criminal for instance, is not stupid by definition? Sadly most other common definitions are a little different: http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=stupid http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=stupid