7 ms·

Show HN: Self-hosted project management application

135 points by chintanb 12y ago

Deusdies 12y ago
This looks exactly like something I've been looking for! Curious, what kind of database (if any) backend is it using? If it's not using MySQL or anything heavy like that, I'm sold!
- NSAID 12y ago
  From the GitHub readme: Minimum Server Requirements PHP 5.4 or greater PDO PHP extendsion MCrypt PHP extendsion GD PHP library MySql Database If your webserver is running Apache then mod_rewrite should be installed
- chintanb 12y ago
  Let me know what kind of database you want to use ? I might be able to help you out.
  - Deusdies 12y ago
    sqlite would be great, or some NoSQL solution such as Mongo (though I see as that being less likely).
    - stephenr 12y ago
      How is mongodb "light" compared to mysql/percona/compatible ?
      - Deusdies 12y ago
        It's not. I just have an instance of MongoDB running on a separate server.
cpfohl 12y ago
I'd love to see a live demo of this...
- chintanb 12y ago
  let me know your email and would set up a demo account for you to test.
  - ProAm 12y ago
    Where can I email you at? I'd love to demo this as well.
johnward 12y ago
Is "self hosted" considered a positive or negative these days? It seems like there is a small niche that still wants control over their data but everyone else seems ok with the cloud.
- daigoba66 12y ago
  I consider it a plus. If I were developing a product like this, I'd build it for self hosting and charge a nominal cost plus yearly a maintenance/support subscription. Then you could deploy the same product yourself and offer it "as a service" for a monthly subscription. Atlassian does this for many of their products.
  - johnward 12y ago
    I skipped over the free part too. Makes sense to be free and self hosted but this would also be cool as a "deploy to heroku" (or whatever cloud PaaS provider officially supports php). I still wonder if the creator has plans to monetize it?
  - johnward 12y ago
    Also as for the business model you've mentioned. I've seen this done in competitive spaces like affiliate marketing. If you don't know most affiliates are super paranoid about thier data as leaking info about a campaign can lead to tons of copies and there goes your revenue. They seem to mostly prefer self hosted apps. Imobitrax offers a self hosted paid tracking system with a monthly fee. A lot of people used to use the free prosper202 self hosted tracking system too. Now recently I'm seeing a shift where people are not afraid to use cloud systems like voluum. I'm not sure what is causing the acceptance to change. It could just be that everything is cloud hosted now so people are getting used to the idea. The problem I see with paid self hosted PHP apps, in this case, is that they are often using ioncube obfuscation and then if I can't read the source how do I know my data is more secure than a cloud provider?
- 23andwalnut 12y ago
  I built a similar project management app (http://duetapp.com http://duetapp.com) and people love the fact that it's self hosted. This segment of the market is definitely smaller than the segment that prefers SaaS, but it's bigger than you might imagine.
aw3c2 12y ago
Free 5 minute grumpy feedback on the landing page :) Requires Javascript to display anything for no good reason. After enabling it and reloading it takes more than 10 seconds to anything but the loading icon to appear. When I quickly scroll down to see what's there, there is nothing, then it fades in. Screenshots are tiny. When I click them they jump into my face. FAQ is hard to impossible to read with the color combination and font and centering. On the whole page I have no idea what is a link and what is not. FAQ items take me back to the top when I click them. Requiring a mail address for downloading (free?!) software is a no-no for me. The buttons at the bottom (fb, twitter etc) have no anchors set so if I hover them, I have no idea what clicking will do. I would not want them to open my mail client or something. No idea what the rightmost icon even means. > 92five app by Chintan Banugaria is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Creative Commons are not for programs. Please choose AGPL or something like that for code. You waste a lot of vertical space, I would suggest putting elements of the top-most part of the side closer together and maybe strip some text like this: http://i.imgur.com/9MjNLvy.png http://i.imgur.com/9MjNLvy.png That way the full screenshot has a better chance to appear on the page. Writing: Don't use slashes when you can use a word instead. "No-one can see / access your todos." could be "No-one can see or access your todos.". You are using "to-do" elsewhere which I prefer. I would recommend also using "To-Dos" in that header. You say "I am sure you will love the design.". I would not use "I" in that page unless you introduce yourself first. Also spotted "Yes its free." -> "Yes, it's free."! ----- The praise is hidden here! The product itself looks slick and useful. Personally I am not a fan of flat design but you seem to have pulled it off nicely. Self-hosted tools are the best, thanks for doing that! I really really really suggest you make the landing page less annoying though. :P
- johnward 12y ago
  I agree with the JS critique. I actually thought something was wrong when it didn't load. I'm not sure the loading time is worth it for those pop-in effects as they aren't really necessary. Also I'm 28 with pretty good vision but I'm having a hard time with that lime green on white.
- Smudge 12y ago
  Yeah I found that loading indicator bizarre. What am I waiting for? Is it circumventing the browser's rendering engine and doing it all in canvas or something? (I mean, I know it's not, that would be silly. It's more likely having to make multiple network requests to fetch the rest of the content.) I can understand the other javascript-ey bits as forgoing some amount of UX/usability in exchange for flashier visuals. But the loading indicator on initial page load just doesn't make sense to me.
tjsix 12y ago
I think this app has potential but after installing a local copy and playing with it for a few minutes there are a few things right off the bat that are a bit of an issue: First, creating a project doesn't work, after putting in the required info and clicking create I'm taken to an error page with no feedback as to what actually happened, even though the screen says 'something went wrong and we've noted that'. Also, requiring to add collaborators even if it's yourself is redundant, this shouldn't be required. Tasks - The main tasks screen really isn't useful at all since each 'Task' takes up a huge amount of space, and all the links on the task card don't do anything, and even when sub-tasks are entered they don't show on the card. This section really seems like it should be tied into projects, not a standalone section, especially since there's a 'Todos' section as well. In many places where input is required, it's not immediately apparent that the colored title area is editable or requires input. There's quite a few little UI tweaks that need to be made, for instance the line height in the quick notes section on the dashboard does not match the notebook lines, so typing anything in there looks sloppy.
skimmas 12y ago
Whoooa and it even runs on a macbook. sorry but I can't help but feeling screenshots inside "macs" look cheesy.
newman8r 12y ago
Seems like it's getting overloaded right now as I just get a loading animation for 20+ seconds. I will take a look at this later though. I have been liking scrumdo which also allows you to self-host the application (in addition to offering to host it for you - which is their profit model)
BorisMelnik 12y ago
I'm really impressed from what I see. Would love an excuse to not spend $200/month on project management software :) I use a very popular SaaS right now but would actually rather self-host (I like to own my data.) Haven't had a chance to install it yet but from from the look of it and general feedback I could see my company making a switch if it all checks out. I don't need responsiveness, HTML 5, a mobile app or any of that. Just gimme something that works!
- claar 12y ago
  What SaaS do you currently use for project management?
  - BorisMelnik 12y ago
    I didn't want to say here, but Basecamp. And I have absolutely nothing against them but I wouldn't mind saving a grand or two every year if this can do the same thing and hold up to a dozen or so users.
    - ishansharma 12y ago
      I'd love that as well. But the killer feature that Basecamp has for me is that you can reply to their emails. Half of my clients have created initial accounts and haven't logged back after that. Yet, they can communicate. If this can do that, I'm switching now!
      - BorisMelnik 12y ago
        You see I didn't even know about that feature, definitely something I 'd like to look into using.
deleted 12y ago
[deleted]
ProAm 12y ago
This looks great.
notduncansmith 12y ago
Took 15 seconds to load the landing page. Honestly, you lost me as a user after the first 5 but I wanted to see the rest of the page. Scrolled to the bottom quickly, had to wait for it to animate in so I was staring at a blank page for a few seconds. Can't be bothered to try the product, since I'll be old and gray by the time it boots.
- jiggy2011 12y ago
  It's probably loading slowly because being linked on HN is giving the server too much traffic. It's self hosted anyway, so that doesn't really matter.
  - notduncansmith 12y ago
    It does really matter - the landing page loads 1.9MB of content. This is easily 10x the size one should expect from a landing page. It's reasonable to assume that the app itself would follow similar proportions, and that means (most likely) load times upwards of 45 seconds. No thanks.
    - jiggy2011 12y ago
      45 seconds? That sounds like a huge overestimate, especially after you've cached the assets. A reasonable internet connection should shift 1.9MB in 2-3 seconds.
      - ishansharma 12y ago
        Depends which country's reasonable you are talking about. In my country, broadband is anything more than 256 kbps! So, to call their services broadband, almost all providers drop speed after FUP limit (anywhere from 8-200 GB) to 256kbps. And average speed is something like 2-3 Mbps.
        staunch 12y ago
        Shitty internet is your problem. Fix it so you can experience the internet properly in 2014.
qmaxquique 12y ago
I just created a demo installation of 92fiveapp at Terminal.com. You just need to spin up a new container using this snapshot: https://terminal.com/tiny/yTUnxPVAiz https://terminal.com/tiny/yTUnxPVAiz
- iamshs 12y ago
  That was helpful. Even though the site required login, but well appreciated.
jotm 12y ago
Looks great, has potential: nice design, self hosted, responsive UI, open source. Maybe create a companion offline app for smartphones/tablets that would sync with the server?
M4v3R 12y ago
I would really love to see some good self-hosted Basecamp killer. This is getting close, but lacks Basecamp's most important feature (at least for me): discussions. This is something that we are using A LOT, and no other software even comes close to what Basecamp has to offer in that area.
calgoo 12y ago
Im currently working on something similar, but focused on the tasks more. Its like a mix of a project manager and a timesheets portal. The front page contains your list of active tasks for the day, and any sticky tasks that you have. The team leader can assign tasks from projects to individual users, and be able to see the current project assigned time, and set threshold for hours spent / left. Project managers will also be able to assign projects to teams, and also see current progress of tasks completed, time spent on tasks etc. I was also thinking of distributing it as a self hosted open source app and maybe a hosted solution as well. For something like this, what would the recomended license be? Something like AGPL or BSD? How would any of you release the software, and if I would like to offer a hosted service in the future, would you worry of others using your software and selling the service as well?
- reitanqild 12y ago
  AGPL feels toxic to me. At least add a commercial option then. I'm working on something myself and my contributions to open source has so far been in sending and getting accepted a few pull requests with improved docs on one project and improvements to some javascript library as well as sneding a few bucks to a couple of projects that takes donations. Haven't release anything serious yet but I know if I do it will be permissive because at the moment I'm giving it away I want it to be as useful as possible and not tied up. (Unless I want to run some dual licensing scheme. ; )
cellover 12y ago
Interesting project! I'm currently working on a green field project with a very small team on my free time, so I installed 92five on my server and will be testing it "as if in production". I will add any issues I encounter on their Github - https://github.com/chintanbanugaria/92five https://github.com/chintanbanugaria/92five
simonswords82 12y ago
The app looks great, but how are you going to make money from this so you can sustain it?
guidedlight 12y ago
Okay, I was just reading through the landing page. Here are my thoughts: * I'm not sure that 'self hosted' needs to be mentioned in the heading. You don't mention cloud or SaaS anywhere and have a big 'download' button so it should be obvious without stating it. * "92five app covers all the basic project management features". Don't say your product is basic, the features should rock. * Responsive. Yawn. Most managers don't know what this means. You don't mention 'mobile' anywhere in this section. * Built with. This is the stuff you're interested in, and it's important but it has nothing to do with the product. Most users wouldn't care whether it's PHP, Java or Basic. * Screenshots. Great we are past the techie bits and back to the actual product... But I don't know what I'm looking at. * Wow, it's free! That's the best part and you mentioned it last... and in the FAQ. This should be up the top of the page! I hope this helps.
- liotier 12y ago
  > Wow, it's free It is not free - you can't make derivatives. It is just free of cost.
cellover 12y ago
I have setup a demo env for those interested: http://92fivedemo.pilgrimbreak.com/ http://92fivedemo.pilgrimbreak.com/ Email: demoguest@92fivedemo.com Password: 12346#0azeRtu I'll keep it up for 1 or 2 days.
- k3oni 12y ago
  I can't seem to be able to access your demo: "This webpage is not available" .
  - cellover 12y ago
    I had no problem connecting. Did you disable javascript?
    - stevoo 12y ago
      i cant access it as well ... but i believe its that my work is blocking certain ports. That could be a reason ... The server at 92fivedemo.pilgrimbreak.com can't be found because the DNS look-up failed. DNS is the network service that translates a website's name to its Internet address. This error is most often caused by having no connection to the Internet or a misconfigured network. It can also be caused by an unresponsive DNS server or a firewall preventing Google Chrome from accessing the network.
      - cellover 12y ago
        It seems the DNS slave was not up to date so you have 50% chance of having no DNS resolution. It appears to be resolved now as I can curl the page from my home server.
    - cellover 12y ago
      It seems some people are having difficulties accessing the subdomain, which I just created. It works from work for me, but not from my home server. I'll try to sort this out ASAP.
chintanb 12y ago
Guys, 92fiveapp is on github Visit https://github.com/chintanbanugaria/92five https://github.com/chintanbanugaria/92five

135 points by chintanb 12y ago

This looks exactly like something I've been looking for! Curious, what kind of database (if any) backend is it using? If it's not using MySQL or anything heavy like that, I'm sold!

NSAID 12y ago
From the GitHub readme: Minimum Server Requirements PHP 5.4 or greater PDO PHP extendsion MCrypt PHP extendsion GD PHP library MySql Database If your webserver is running Apache then mod_rewrite should be installed
chintanb 12y ago
Let me know what kind of database you want to use ? I might be able to help you out.
- Deusdies 12y ago
  sqlite would be great, or some NoSQL solution such as Mongo (though I see as that being less likely).
  - stephenr 12y ago
    How is mongodb "light" compared to mysql/percona/compatible ?
    - Deusdies 12y ago
      It's not. I just have an instance of MongoDB running on a separate server.

cpfohl 12y ago

I'd love to see a live demo of this...

chintanb 12y ago
let me know your email and would set up a demo account for you to test.
- ProAm 12y ago
  Where can I email you at? I'd love to demo this as well.

johnward 12y ago

Is "self hosted" considered a positive or negative these days? It seems like there is a small niche that still wants control over their data but everyone else seems ok with the cloud.

daigoba66 12y ago
I consider it a plus. If I were developing a product like this, I'd build it for self hosting and charge a nominal cost plus yearly a maintenance/support subscription. Then you could deploy the same product yourself and offer it "as a service" for a monthly subscription. Atlassian does this for many of their products.
- johnward 12y ago
  I skipped over the free part too. Makes sense to be free and self hosted but this would also be cool as a "deploy to heroku" (or whatever cloud PaaS provider officially supports php). I still wonder if the creator has plans to monetize it?
- johnward 12y ago
  Also as for the business model you've mentioned. I've seen this done in competitive spaces like affiliate marketing. If you don't know most affiliates are super paranoid about thier data as leaking info about a campaign can lead to tons of copies and there goes your revenue. They seem to mostly prefer self hosted apps. Imobitrax offers a self hosted paid tracking system with a monthly fee. A lot of people used to use the free prosper202 self hosted tracking system too. Now recently I'm seeing a shift where people are not afraid to use cloud systems like voluum. I'm not sure what is causing the acceptance to change. It could just be that everything is cloud hosted now so people are getting used to the idea. The problem I see with paid self hosted PHP apps, in this case, is that they are often using ioncube obfuscation and then if I can't read the source how do I know my data is more secure than a cloud provider?
23andwalnut 12y ago
I built a similar project management app (http://duetapp.com http://duetapp.com) and people love the fact that it's self hosted. This segment of the market is definitely smaller than the segment that prefers SaaS, but it's bigger than you might imagine.

aw3c2 12y ago

Free 5 minute grumpy feedback on the landing page :) Requires Javascript to display anything for no good reason. After enabling it and reloading it takes more than 10 seconds to anything but the loading icon to appear. When I quickly scroll down to see what's there, there is nothing, then it fades in. Screenshots are tiny. When I click them they jump into my face. FAQ is hard to impossible to read with the color combination and font and centering. On the whole page I have no idea what is a link and what is not. FAQ items take me back to the top when I click them. Requiring a mail address for downloading (free?!) software is a no-no for me. The buttons at the bottom (fb, twitter etc) have no anchors set so if I hover them, I have no idea what clicking will do. I would not want them to open my mail client or something. No idea what the rightmost icon even means. > 92five app by Chintan Banugaria is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Creative Commons are not for programs. Please choose AGPL or something like that for code. You waste a lot of vertical space, I would suggest putting elements of the top-most part of the side closer together and maybe strip some text like this: http://i.imgur.com/9MjNLvy.png http://i.imgur.com/9MjNLvy.png That way the full screenshot has a better chance to appear on the page. Writing: Don't use slashes when you can use a word instead. "No-one can see / access your todos." could be "No-one can see or access your todos.". You are using "to-do" elsewhere which I prefer. I would recommend also using "To-Dos" in that header. You say "I am sure you will love the design.". I would not use "I" in that page unless you introduce yourself first. Also spotted "Yes its free." -> "Yes, it's free."! ----- The praise is hidden here! The product itself looks slick and useful. Personally I am not a fan of flat design but you seem to have pulled it off nicely. Self-hosted tools are the best, thanks for doing that! I really really really suggest you make the landing page less annoying though. :P

johnward 12y ago
I agree with the JS critique. I actually thought something was wrong when it didn't load. I'm not sure the loading time is worth it for those pop-in effects as they aren't really necessary. Also I'm 28 with pretty good vision but I'm having a hard time with that lime green on white.
Smudge 12y ago
Yeah I found that loading indicator bizarre. What am I waiting for? Is it circumventing the browser's rendering engine and doing it all in canvas or something? (I mean, I know it's not, that would be silly. It's more likely having to make multiple network requests to fetch the rest of the content.) I can understand the other javascript-ey bits as forgoing some amount of UX/usability in exchange for flashier visuals. But the loading indicator on initial page load just doesn't make sense to me.

tjsix 12y ago

I think this app has potential but after installing a local copy and playing with it for a few minutes there are a few things right off the bat that are a bit of an issue: First, creating a project doesn't work, after putting in the required info and clicking create I'm taken to an error page with no feedback as to what actually happened, even though the screen says 'something went wrong and we've noted that'. Also, requiring to add collaborators even if it's yourself is redundant, this shouldn't be required. Tasks - The main tasks screen really isn't useful at all since each 'Task' takes up a huge amount of space, and all the links on the task card don't do anything, and even when sub-tasks are entered they don't show on the card. This section really seems like it should be tied into projects, not a standalone section, especially since there's a 'Todos' section as well. In many places where input is required, it's not immediately apparent that the colored title area is editable or requires input. There's quite a few little UI tweaks that need to be made, for instance the line height in the quick notes section on the dashboard does not match the notebook lines, so typing anything in there looks sloppy.

skimmas 12y ago

Whoooa and it even runs on a macbook. sorry but I can't help but feeling screenshots inside "macs" look cheesy.

newman8r 12y ago

Seems like it's getting overloaded right now as I just get a loading animation for 20+ seconds. I will take a look at this later though. I have been liking scrumdo which also allows you to self-host the application (in addition to offering to host it for you - which is their profit model)

BorisMelnik 12y ago

I'm really impressed from what I see. Would love an excuse to not spend $200/month on project management software :) I use a very popular SaaS right now but would actually rather self-host (I like to own my data.) Haven't had a chance to install it yet but from from the look of it and general feedback I could see my company making a switch if it all checks out. I don't need responsiveness, HTML 5, a mobile app or any of that. Just gimme something that works!

claar 12y ago
What SaaS do you currently use for project management?
- BorisMelnik 12y ago
  I didn't want to say here, but Basecamp. And I have absolutely nothing against them but I wouldn't mind saving a grand or two every year if this can do the same thing and hold up to a dozen or so users.
  - ishansharma 12y ago
    I'd love that as well. But the killer feature that Basecamp has for me is that you can reply to their emails. Half of my clients have created initial accounts and haven't logged back after that. Yet, they can communicate. If this can do that, I'm switching now!
    - BorisMelnik 12y ago
      You see I didn't even know about that feature, definitely something I 'd like to look into using.

deleted 12y ago

[deleted]

ProAm 12y ago

This looks great.

notduncansmith 12y ago

Took 15 seconds to load the landing page. Honestly, you lost me as a user after the first 5 but I wanted to see the rest of the page. Scrolled to the bottom quickly, had to wait for it to animate in so I was staring at a blank page for a few seconds. Can't be bothered to try the product, since I'll be old and gray by the time it boots.

jiggy2011 12y ago
It's probably loading slowly because being linked on HN is giving the server too much traffic. It's self hosted anyway, so that doesn't really matter.
- notduncansmith 12y ago
  It does really matter - the landing page loads 1.9MB of content. This is easily 10x the size one should expect from a landing page. It's reasonable to assume that the app itself would follow similar proportions, and that means (most likely) load times upwards of 45 seconds. No thanks.
  - jiggy2011 12y ago
    45 seconds? That sounds like a huge overestimate, especially after you've cached the assets. A reasonable internet connection should shift 1.9MB in 2-3 seconds.
    - ishansharma 12y ago
      Depends which country's reasonable you are talking about. In my country, broadband is anything more than 256 kbps! So, to call their services broadband, almost all providers drop speed after FUP limit (anywhere from 8-200 GB) to 256kbps. And average speed is something like 2-3 Mbps.
      - staunch 12y ago
        Shitty internet is your problem. Fix it so you can experience the internet properly in 2014.

qmaxquique 12y ago

I just created a demo installation of 92fiveapp at Terminal.com. You just need to spin up a new container using this snapshot: https://terminal.com/tiny/yTUnxPVAiz https://terminal.com/tiny/yTUnxPVAiz

iamshs 12y ago
That was helpful. Even though the site required login, but well appreciated.

jotm 12y ago

Looks great, has potential: nice design, self hosted, responsive UI, open source. Maybe create a companion offline app for smartphones/tablets that would sync with the server?

M4v3R 12y ago

I would really love to see some good self-hosted Basecamp killer. This is getting close, but lacks Basecamp's most important feature (at least for me): discussions. This is something that we are using A LOT, and no other software even comes close to what Basecamp has to offer in that area.

calgoo 12y ago

Im currently working on something similar, but focused on the tasks more. Its like a mix of a project manager and a timesheets portal. The front page contains your list of active tasks for the day, and any sticky tasks that you have. The team leader can assign tasks from projects to individual users, and be able to see the current project assigned time, and set threshold for hours spent / left. Project managers will also be able to assign projects to teams, and also see current progress of tasks completed, time spent on tasks etc. I was also thinking of distributing it as a self hosted open source app and maybe a hosted solution as well. For something like this, what would the recomended license be? Something like AGPL or BSD? How would any of you release the software, and if I would like to offer a hosted service in the future, would you worry of others using your software and selling the service as well?

reitanqild 12y ago
AGPL feels toxic to me. At least add a commercial option then. I'm working on something myself and my contributions to open source has so far been in sending and getting accepted a few pull requests with improved docs on one project and improvements to some javascript library as well as sneding a few bucks to a couple of projects that takes donations. Haven't release anything serious yet but I know if I do it will be permissive because at the moment I'm giving it away I want it to be as useful as possible and not tied up. (Unless I want to run some dual licensing scheme. ; )

cellover 12y ago

Interesting project! I'm currently working on a green field project with a very small team on my free time, so I installed 92five on my server and will be testing it "as if in production". I will add any issues I encounter on their Github - https://github.com/chintanbanugaria/92five https://github.com/chintanbanugaria/92five

simonswords82 12y ago

The app looks great, but how are you going to make money from this so you can sustain it?

guidedlight 12y ago

Okay, I was just reading through the landing page. Here are my thoughts: * I'm not sure that 'self hosted' needs to be mentioned in the heading. You don't mention cloud or SaaS anywhere and have a big 'download' button so it should be obvious without stating it. * "92five app covers all the basic project management features". Don't say your product is basic, the features should rock. * Responsive. Yawn. Most managers don't know what this means. You don't mention 'mobile' anywhere in this section. * Built with. This is the stuff you're interested in, and it's important but it has nothing to do with the product. Most users wouldn't care whether it's PHP, Java or Basic. * Screenshots. Great we are past the techie bits and back to the actual product... But I don't know what I'm looking at. * Wow, it's free! That's the best part and you mentioned it last... and in the FAQ. This should be up the top of the page! I hope this helps.

liotier 12y ago
> Wow, it's free It is not free - you can't make derivatives. It is just free of cost.

cellover 12y ago

I have setup a demo env for those interested: http://92fivedemo.pilgrimbreak.com/ http://92fivedemo.pilgrimbreak.com/ Email: demoguest@92fivedemo.com Password: 12346#0azeRtu I'll keep it up for 1 or 2 days.

k3oni 12y ago
I can't seem to be able to access your demo: "This webpage is not available" .
- cellover 12y ago
  I had no problem connecting. Did you disable javascript?
  - stevoo 12y ago
    i cant access it as well ... but i believe its that my work is blocking certain ports. That could be a reason ... The server at 92fivedemo.pilgrimbreak.com can't be found because the DNS look-up failed. DNS is the network service that translates a website's name to its Internet address. This error is most often caused by having no connection to the Internet or a misconfigured network. It can also be caused by an unresponsive DNS server or a firewall preventing Google Chrome from accessing the network.
    - cellover 12y ago
      It seems the DNS slave was not up to date so you have 50% chance of having no DNS resolution. It appears to be resolved now as I can curl the page from my home server.
  - cellover 12y ago
    It seems some people are having difficulties accessing the subdomain, which I just created. It works from work for me, but not from my home server. I'll try to sort this out ASAP.

chintanb 12y ago

Guys, 92fiveapp is on github Visit https://github.com/chintanbanugaria/92five https://github.com/chintanbanugaria/92five