So, you wouldn't buy a copy and yet you claim others have never read it? My parents buy it, so I've read it fairly often at their house, but, no, I wouldn't bu

So, you wouldn't buy a copy and yet you claim others have never read it? My parents buy it, so I've read it fairly often at their house, but, no, I wouldn't buy it myself. So yes, I have read it on many occasions, while most of those who bash it do so without having ever read a copy. To put the guardian and the daily mail in the same column is doing serious injustice to the guardian. I didn't put them in the same column: as I said, the Mail is a tabloid. All I said is that both are heavily biased, which is true. Each writes with its own audience in mind: Guardian readers won't like what's written in the Mail, and vice-versa. Accusations beyond this, such as yours of "wildly inaccurate journalism", are more exaggerated and sensational than any Mail headline.