8 ms·
> There is no reason why the payment processor can't implement some security in case of errors. Sure, and banks already do that. A lot of it, in fact. My poin
by nmrm 12y ago
> There is no reason why the payment processor can't implement some security in case of errors.
Sure, and banks already do that. A lot of it, in fact.
My point wasn't that these things aren't possible with BTC. Rather, my point was that these problems don't go away just because you're not using a traditional currency. Which means the overhead associated with these problems doesn't go away, either.
It's just that BTC is really small right now, and so the cost + difficulty of addressing these problems at scale isn't yet apparent.
> with credit cards you are handing out your details every time you do a purchase.
(1) No one makes payroll with a credit card; (2) BTC transfers -- especially at scale -- aren't as fast as CC transfers without someone assuming some risk; (3) CC companies basically exist to assume that risk and mitigate; (4) if you're going to design a new payment processing technology appropriate for POS transactions, creating a new currency is absolutely not necessary.
> In a BTC economy
Well.
- baddox 12y ago> My point wasn't that these things aren't possible with BTC. Rather, my point was that these problems don't go away just because you're not using a traditional currency. Which means the overhead associated with these problems doesn't go away, either. I think the advantage is that alternatives to the traditional banking system introduce competition in the banking and financial services industry. Obviously, overhead doesn't magically go away, but I would expect competition to result in an increase in efficiency.
- nmrm 12y agoI absolutely agree. edit/justification: given the length of this thread and other interactions, I think this 'agree' post is a non-trivial recognition of consensus on a point rather than a non-contribution.