4 ms·
There is never a balance of power between the employer and the employee. If there were, the employee wouldn't have to work for the employer, since he'd have ju
by heylefty 12y ago
There is never a balance of power between the employer and the employee.
If there were, the employee wouldn't have to work for the employer, since he'd have just as much money and influence in the first place.
Your argument condemns all employment.
- saraid216 12y agoI'm okay with that condemnation. Do you have a real refutation?
- heylefty 12y agoI thought it was obvious, but I'll spell it out for you. A worldview that would seek to ban all employment without proposing some alternative method of partitioning the world's limited resources is nonsensical.
- IanCal 12y ago> If there were, the employee wouldn't have to work for the employer, since he'd have just as much money and influence in the first place. So the employer needs no employees? > Your argument condemns all employment. Only exploitative employment.