6 ms·
Seems neat, and I appreciate the forward-thinking mentality. But, as far as I am aware, emoji are a fad and won't really stand the test of time anyway. Either w
by deaconblues 12y ago
Seems neat, and I appreciate the forward-thinking mentality. But, as far as I am aware, emoji are a fad and won't really stand the test of time anyway. Either way, I guess, it's nice to see these easy-to-use, easy-to-create principals in play.
- nostromo 12y agoEmoji aren't going anywhere. They've been around in Japan for over a decade and have been enshrined forever in Unicode 6.
- Synaesthesia 12y agoI thought so too, until I started using them in my messages to my friends and girlfriend. Now I find them an integral part of my communications. 😄
- ranran876 12y agoOh the irony. Your emoji comes out as a blank square for me (Windows 7 - Opera 12)
- wlesieutre 12y agoChrome does the blank square as well, but it works in Firefox and IE. (win7)
- heinrich5991 12y agoWorks for me in FF on Linux.
- shanselman 12y agoLooks good here, IE11 on Windows 8.1
- raphman_ 12y agoOpera 12 on Debian GNU/Linux shows it fine
- davb 12y agoConsider installing the Symbola font [1]. Where Unicode fallback works correctly, missing glyphs from the regular site font will be taken from Symbola. It's the most comprehensive freely available emoji font I could find (although it doesn't look anywhere as good as full color emojis and at average website font sizes can render a little too small to make out any detail). [1] http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/ http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/
- wubbfindel 12y agoA few seem to be really missing the point of this article, which has little to do with emoji itself. TLDR; MS's approach to implementing a color emoji font could lead to a very useable color font format. EDIT: typos
- deaconblues 12y agoI think I addressed that in my comment. The article is a little about emoji, and I addressed that too.