5 ms·

>because they both allow me to write stupid programs with performance problems. Which language doesn't?

• michaelochurch 12y ago
  He's being sarcastic (I think).
  • bad_user 12y ago
    I'm pretty sure he's being half-sarcastic.
    • michaelochurch 12y ago
      I wonder what he considers to be good languages. Is he a C++ diehard, or a Haskell purist?
      • javadocmd 12y ago
        Perhaps he's saying all current languages suck in that respect, and that the future of programming is languages that don't let you write unoptimizable code.
        • fleitz 12y ago
          I guess programmers won't be allowed to write optimized code anymore, as optimized code is unoptimizable :)
  • hellodevnull 12y ago
    Okay and I have somehow said something terrible because I didn't pick up on this hilarious dubious sarcasm in a post about benchmarks.
• szatkus 12y ago
  Brainfuck.