8 ms·
I love this idea. Chrome's history is insufficient; I swear, it often doesn't record sites I've visited. But.. I'm not ready to trust an unknown process sending
by sgibat 12y ago
I love this idea. Chrome's history is insufficient; I swear, it often doesn't record sites I've visited. But.. I'm not ready to trust an unknown process sending my entire browsing history to unknown servers. Excited for a potential local version.
- tgb 12y agoAgreed. I learned recently that you get better history search by going to Google and having it only show 'visited sites'.
- mixologic 12y agoVisited pages only seems to include the sites you visit immediately after doing a google search. It does not include pages found through normal browsing.
- ryanpardieck 12y agoYeah, I noticed just today that it doesn't record everything! Very strange. Could turbolinks-alike implementations be throwing it off?
- joshvm 12y agoChrome's history is inordinately awful. Get this addon: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/better-history/obciceimmggglbmelaidpjlmodcebijb?hl=en https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/better-history/obc...
- joshschreuder 12y agoI've always thought this, so thanks for the extension, looks pretty good. It would be nice to have some geek stats like a top x list of your most visited sites.