5 ms·
Note that Privacy Badger uses a browser history-dependent algorithm for blocking - when you first install it, it doesn't block anything because it assumes that
by unhush 12y ago
Note that Privacy Badger uses a browser history-dependent algorithm for blocking - when you first install it, it doesn't block anything because it assumes that third-party trackers are innocent until proven guilty. When it sees you being tracked on 3+ first-party domains by a third party, it either blocks or cookieblocks the third party. I wrote up a basic description of the algorithm here: https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadgerfirefox/blob/master/README.md https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadgerfirefox/blob/master/R...
So if you're testing Privacy Badger on a profile with no browsing history, it is bound to do worse than other extensions. You have to "prime" it with some browsing data before it's really effective.
- gorhill 12y agoI see, so this means results for Privacy Badger reflect a worst-case scenario. I've added links to the proper section in the Privacy Badger's README file.
- nabla9 12y agoSo people who use incognito mode don't benefit much?
- unhush 12y agoUnfortunately not, if you use Incognito by default (other than being able to see who's tracking you and toggle the settings manually). We could add a feature to optionally save data in Privacy Badger between incognito sessions (or use data from the non-incognito sessions to determine which sites to block in incognito sessions). In Firefox, PBadger Alpha doesn't have permission to operate in Incognito mode yet, so it will just be off.
- unhush 12y agoTracking bug for this (in Firefox): https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadgerfirefox/issues/11 https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadgerfirefox/issues/11