5 ms·
"... but if they want good stuff dev'd on it" I think this completely misses the point. Applications are web apps. You're not supposed to dev for the OS. Edit
by UpFromTheGut 17y ago
"... but if they want good stuff dev'd on it"
I think this completely misses the point. Applications are web apps. You're not supposed to dev for the OS.
Edit: formatting
- jhancock 17y agonope, wasn't missing the point at all. Imagine if you will, I'm developing a webapp. I want to target ChromeOS users. I could run a separate VM to test on, but no, I want to dev and test on one system for the most part. I want my app framework stack and all the tools running on this thing and use the web browser to look things up on localhost, right. Also, if this is to end up being a good open source citizen and google doesn't expect to do _all_ the work, developers need to be able to work on the platform as developers and not use it remotely to test and debug. Thats' what I 'm talkin' 'bout ;) I get the whole HTML 5 and Web 2.0++ thing.
- wmf 17y agoFor testing you use Chrome on a real OS.
- jhancock 17y agoI probably didn't make myself very clear in the last post. Lets say ChromeOS gets put on netbooks and is a solid option compared to a Windows 7 or Linux netbook. Am I, a hacker, going to use such a device? No, I have more to do than just use webapps. So as a hacker, its of little interest to me unless I can also use a good subset of linux dev tools.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- freetard 17y agoRight, so iphone and android devs develop directly on the phones, otherwise there wouldn't be any apps...
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- UpFromTheGut 17y agoI see your point now, thanks for elaborating. As it stands, I use my desktop for dev work, which I wouldn't think of putting Chrome OS on, but, I still am eager to put it on my laptop.