>The main force holding me back from learning Haskell is the cryptic syntax Haskell doesn't have a cryptic syntax. The same complaint would be just as (in)val

>The main force holding me back from learning Haskell is the cryptic syntax Haskell doesn't have a cryptic syntax. The same complaint would be just as (in)valid leveled at any commonly used language. We're not talking APL here. >There are so many great languages out there nowadays, Clojure, Go, Erlang. Go does not belong in that list. >I don't see where Haskell would be a better fit For writing software. I realize that sounds snarky, but that really is the answer. To see the problem with your question, just turn it around. Where would clojure or go be a better fit than haskell?