It's a matter of taste. I personally feel that your specific examples make Rust more readable, because of how little space gets wasted on those frequent, unamb

It's a matter of taste. I personally feel that your specific examples make Rust more readable, because of how little space gets wasted on those frequent, unambiguous names. Ubiquitous boilerplete-ish things that show up everywhere should recede a bit, imo; let me spend my line width budget on what's unique and important about my code. But again, it's just a matter of taste and not really worth wasting a lot of time worrying about. The important thing about Rust is its semantics (speed, safety, control), not its syntax.