5 ms·
Responsive views only go so far. Trying to shrink an app designed for a desktop browser down to a 4" phone is a fool's errand. Much easier to go with different
by dhh 12y ago
Responsive views only go so far. Trying to shrink an app designed for a desktop browser down to a 4" phone is a fool's errand. Much easier to go with different templates in that case.
- benwoodward 12y agoI guess you can mix responsive layouts with variant templates anyway, right? Just place your responsive markup in a partial and reference it in.
- oelmekki 12y ago> Trying to shrink an app designed for a desktop browser down to a 4" phone is a fool's errand That's why, when you design a responsive website, you're supposed to think / work out mobile first. Hoping to detect all mobile devices out there based on their http request is no wiser.
- sergiotapia 12y agoYou end up with a LOT of hidden or visible markup, redundant on both mobile and desktop. After working on responsive websites for about 2 years now, I feel that variants is the way to go with Mobile designs. You flesh out something lightweight for mobile and then another for tablet + desktop + whatever. Otherwise your mobile display is needlessly large.