7 ms·
If it wasn't for the money, I'd think these guys were just clueless. Billions excuse much.
by benched 12y ago
If it wasn't for the money, I'd think these guys were just clueless. Billions excuse much.
- DerpDerpDerp 12y agoIt's really hard to get people to understand something their paycheck requires them not to.
- stan_rogers 12y agoWhat, precisely, is it that you think they don't understand (and a bunch of random gamers do)?
- DerpDerpDerp 12y agoI think they're turning a blind eye to the way many people view Facebook, Facebook's habit of making decisions that compromise user privacy (since that's how they make money), and so on because it's in their financial advantage to be bought out like that. Zuckerberg's comments about potential paths that VR will take (with Facebook's backing) already admit that he's planning many of the things that people are saying they're worried about, and the Oculus people are just going "Huh? What? I don't know what you mean...."
- stan_rogers 12y agoAnd those potential paths are things that people have been talking about since,... well, since VR was a runt puppy that only some kid named Jaron loved. The gaming community has a very parochial, blinkered view of what the technology promises. Frankly, the last game I was even mildly interested in was Q*bert, but the promise of immersive VR worlds of every kind - especially social - excites the hell out of me.
- waterlesscloud 12y agoWhat here indicates cluelessness to you?
- muyuu 12y agoThat they say they're surprised about the backlash. That means they're either clueless or lying. I'd vote lying myself though.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]