6 ms·
Do we though? I think we need to fight to keep speech in the open. There's no constitutional right to free speech that can't be traced back to you. If we're go
by tthomas48 12y ago
Do we though? I think we need to fight to keep speech in the open. There's no constitutional right to free speech that can't be traced back to you.
If we're going to equate money and speech then we have to equate the fact that speech is audible. Money masquerading as speech needs to be as well.
If you're not willing to stand up for what you believe then you have no business saying it.
- shittyanalogy 12y agoYou don't think anonymous speech should be protected? Voting? Reporting crimes in your neighborhood? Protesting an employer decision? You can't think of any case where people would want their speech to be anonymous with just reason?
- tthomas48 12y agoIn the US voting is not guaranteed to be anonymous. It's protected and (mostly) un-traced to prevent coercion. But the fact you voted is recorded. If you live in a district with few enough voters (or voters who all vote the same way) your voting record could be used to tell who you voted for. I don't think the other ones you mentioned are particularly compelling, no. There are ways to protect the names of people who report crimes without guaranteeing absolute anonymity.
- transitionality 12y agoActually, the Founding Fathers were pretty big on anonymous free speech. Remember the Federalist Papers.