5 ms·
Never thought I'll see that on a google service. Thanks for the cache.
by mojaam 17y ago
Never thought I'll see that on a google service. Thanks for the cache.
- Jebdm 17y agoIt's fairly ironic--Google is restricting the page views (to limit bandwidth usage), but at that same time they're hosting a copy in cache of that same page, with no limits.
- CamperBob 17y agoNo kidding. That's so moronically un-Google, it's got to be a bug rather than a genuine quota issue. Because otherwise, Google 2009 == GeoCities 1999, and that would be unthinkable.
- gojomo 17y agoI find "Google 2009 == GeoCities 1999" very thinkable, especially if tweaked a little to "Google Sites 2009 == GeoCities 1999". Empires rise and fall fast on the net. Google is now a mish-mash of offerings which get uneven attention from their internal talent. 'Sites' itself is a successor to the soon-to-be-shuttered Google Page Creator (which unlike Sites allowed custom CSS and JS). A few key people leave, a couple bad quarters -- 'Sites' could get the axe too.