6 ms·
It looks like it says there are enough cases where libraries crave two multiplication operators, elementwise multiplication and matrix multiplication, that it m
by gradys 13y ago
It looks like it says there are enough cases where libraries crave two multiplication operators, elementwise multiplication and matrix multiplication, that it makes sense to add an operator to the language.
- bsaul 13y agoWould matrix multiplicqtion be useful for anything other than matrices ? I can understand to provide an operator in the language when it's usable by many types, but i don't understand what sense would it have to create an operator just for one type... Even more so when that type isn't part of the language. Or does it mean that @ would be used just for arrays, and that it would be useful for cases when arrays aren't matrices of numbers ?