32 ms·

I always assumed analogies were explicitly designed as a mechanism for testing vocabulary, not reasoning. I don't understand how analogies would have any value

I always assumed analogies were explicitly designed as a mechanism for testing vocabulary, not reasoning. I don't understand how analogies would have any value in testing reasoning skills. I can't imagine an analogy question that isn't either obvious or subjective.

jonnathanson 13y ago
The whole point of analogy problems is to test reasoning skills. Specifically, logical skills, inferences, categorization, and so forth. The vocabulary test nested within the analogy test is incidental. It creates a bivariate challenge (vocabulary + categorization), which is not necessarily an invalid test. It's just not a pure test of analogies, and it's also duplicative of the vocabulary portion of the test. In re the value of analogies, there are some computer scientists and philosophers who believe analogy-drawing is the irreducible core of higher cognition. I'm not sure I'd go that far, but Douglas Hofstadter has come close: http://www.amazon.com/Surfaces-Essences-Analogy-Fuel-Thinking/dp/0465018475 http://www.amazon.com/Surfaces-Essences-Analogy-Fuel-Thinkin...
minor_nitwit 13y ago
why not both?
- Zhenya 13y ago
  when you test for both, its tougher to get a good measure on either.