7 ms·
> "and Legos are selling because they're priced appropriately" Nope never said that, show me where I said this.
by leobelle 13y ago
> "and Legos are selling because they're priced appropriately"
Nope never said that, show me where I said this.
- mindslight 13y agoIt's a basic tenet of consensual transactions, which you allude to: > people have voted with their wallets and have said that Legos are worth greater than the sum of their parts Also, > Legos are priced at what they sell at" If you're taking issue that it's not a direct iron-clad "tautology", then please insert whatever less-stringent term you please that indicates circular reasoning by which a process supposedly justifies itself.
- leobelle 13y ago> people have voted with their wallets and have said that Legos are worth greater than the sum of their parts That's half a quote. The point you misquoted was very specific, regarding Legos being priced higher than their material costs works, because people value Legos for more than the plastic they're made with. That's not a tautology, that's a simple observation. This is without a doubt the worst conversation I've ever had about Legos.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- mindslight 13y agoI said "allude to", which still applies to your whole quote. This "conversation" has been terrible because you've been nitpicking for seemingly its own sake, while completely ignoring any substance of what I've said.
- leobelle 13y agoNo it doesn't apply, and thus the substance of whatever you've said doesn't appeal to me. It fails a heuristic of mine I'll call "throws out false accusations after misrepresenting what I've said".
- mindslight 13y agoIf you don't believe that a product's price effects its sales, then you could have simply stated this several comments back, rather than role-playing a computer by placing critical importance on the form of my saying why I assumed you agreed with that widely-held belief. Then we could have actually talked about the actual non-meta issue.