5 ms·
Commit introducing the bug: https://www.gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/commit/0fba2d908da6d0df821991ea5fdbeeda0f4ff089 https://www.gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/com
by acc00 13y ago
Commit introducing the bug:
https://www.gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/commit/0fba2d908da6d0df821991ea5fdbeeda0f4ff089 https://www.gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/commit/0fba2d908da6d...
- zwily 13y agoAnd the fix: https://www.gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/commit/6aa26f78150ccbdf0aec1878a41c17c41d358a3b?diffmode=sidebyside#lib/x509/verify.c https://www.gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/commit/6aa26f78150cc...
- acqq 13y agoCommit: #0fba2d9 "Improved the certificate generation stuff."
- snarfy 13y agoOn one hand this makes me wary of the quality of GnuTLS source in general, and on the other I know I am guilty of similar commit messages.
- elwell 13y agowow "10 years ago" and git was only released 9 years ago
- Jach 13y agoYour comment made me pause while reading this thread -- what exactly is surprising about that? Repo migration is a thing...
- Estragon 13y agoMaybe the patch wouldr have gotten more attention if he'd broken it up into smaller chunks.