7 ms·
Shock threat to shut Skype
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- adamt 17y agoIt does make you wonder about eBay's M&A team if they buy a company for $2.6Bn but still have to license the key bit of technology from the people they bought it from, AND with a license that the other side didn't have to renew. Should at least make for an interesting lawsuit and a nice pay day for some lawyers!
- terpua 17y agoMaybe the Skype founders just asked (or demanded). http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=725848 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=725848 Or eBay did a IBM/MS/DOS redux.
- yardie 17y agoHow do you pay so much for a company and end up having to pay more for the technology. I don't even know why they paid so much for skype in the first place. Yes, the technology is cool, but not $2.6Bn cool. Even if they did have to license the engine it should have been perpetual with a buyout option. Then, again eBay must have been drunk off all the monies they are making screwing over users with insane fees.
- rimantas 17y agoMaybe already having millions of users does make technology a bit cooler?
- mixmax 17y agoWell, compared to some other acquisitions, youtube springs to mind here, it isn't that bad of a deal. Skype is a leader in a rapidly growing market with high entry barriers, have a unique technology, a real business model and a lot of users.
- jwilliams 17y agoeBay announced it is planning to IPO Skype next year. I guess this is somehow related.
- bhrgunatha 17y agoYes, it sounds like an obvious tactic to spice up pricing negotiations. I can't imagine what other reason the founders could have for revoking or not renewing the license
- incomethax 17y agoOr it may have something to do with this: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/10/report-founders-want-to-buy-skype-from-ebay/ http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/10/report-founders-want-to...
- jwilliams 17y agoInteresting - that announcement was just immediately prior to the eBay Skype IPO announcement (which was April 14 according to a quick Google..)
- dctoedt 17y agoWhen eBay agreed to license (not buy) the key piece of technology, I wonder why the license wasn't made irrevocable.
- dctoedt 17y agoIrrevocability could have been conditioned on paying some stated sum (possibly increasing over time) to the licensor.
- riffic 17y agogood riddance, maybe their users will jump to Google Talk or other standards-based services. This should serve as a cautionary tale to any company who relies on licensing proprietary technology in spite of emergent open standards.
- madars 17y agoGoogle Talk is not standards-based at all. It is a proprietary extension to XMMP. Edit: I was wrong. Thanks, riffic! They have documented everything -- http://code.google.com/apis/talk/talk_developers_home.html http://code.google.com/apis/talk/talk_developers_home.html
- riffic 17y agohttp://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html