5 ms·

That's a lot of "mind reading" you've accomplished there -- complete with imagined quotes. Quite an accomplishment.

• DelightfulScone 13y ago
  That is effectively what I was attempting to highlight. No minds read. On the topic of tortured logic, I would love to know why you don't think the lawsuit[0] is about fracking when it involves water and the infrastructure that supplies it for those activities. [0] http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/water20140220.pdf http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/water201402...
  • roboneal 13y ago
    Nice document you supplied. Did you read it? This lawsuit is about repeated assurances to the MANY plantiffs that the only plans for the property were for "low rise" (below the tree line) water tanks and the company later deciding to violate existing zoning regulations and seek to built the 160 ft water tank. Your bias on this issue is only exceeded by your laziness.
    • DelightfulScone 13y ago
      And if you would direct your attention to the man's profession, you can see where people's idea of hypocrisy stems from. Thanks for calling me lazy, easy out that is.