5 ms·

I'm sorry, I honestly don't see the problem here. Is it illegal or somehow immoral to identify the consequence of a business decision?

• joe_the_user 13y ago
  Well, as matter of fact Jobs was engaged in intimidation aimed to maintain an arrangement that has been found to be illegal (the "anti-poaching" 'agreement').
  • codelap 13y ago
    Really good point. I really really should have read the full article, not just the title, and the highlighted section. I thought I saw this text almost verbatim before having to do with a licensing dispute.
• pessimizer 13y ago
  Isn't a mugging simply identifying the consequence of a business decision?
• taopao 13y ago
  In the same way that spatial manipulation of an object from the boundaries defined by its legal owner is considered theft.
• jusben1369 13y ago
  but that's not what is happening. You are coercing someone via threats and intimidation to join you in an illegal act. don't get confused by the fact it's described with 'business sounding" words.