5 ms·

Airbnb and Housing

39 points by lennysan 13y ago

sneak 13y ago
I am really tired of these "oh shit we have to issue a PR spin control response" posts that presume I've already read the original drama and don't link to it. "You might have seen a story" my ass. Link to something if you're going to respond to it.
- brianchesky 13y ago
  You're right; we should have linked to it. I'm changing that now.
  - gamblor956 13y ago
    Are you also planning on addressing the numerous factual misrepresentations in the post? Because your [edit:AirBnB's (Brian is CEO is AirBNB)] already poor credibility is taking a real beating: see pretty much all of the comments on this page.
    - calbear81 13y ago
      Methinks a smart person would listen to their lawyer and not make any claims on this or any other public forum while embroiled in an active lawsuit.
    - brianchesky 13y ago
      I am not aware of any factual misrepresentations, but I am working my way through some of the comments.
  - brianchesky 13y ago
    Here is the link so you don't have to go back to the story: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/airbnb_gentrification_how_the_sharing_economy_drives_up_housing_prices.html http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/airb...
alcari 13y ago
> 87% of Airbnb hosts in New York share only the home in which they live Does this mean they're admitting that 13% of Airbnb hosts in New York are sharing other properties? I was under the impression that Airbnb strongly denied such people existed.
- mjolk 13y ago
  That's kind of crazy -- more than one out of ten is an illegal hotel as per their own statistics.
- ironchef 13y ago
  There was something mentioned here: http://skift.com/2014/02/13/airbnb-in-nyc-the-real-numbers-behind-the-sharing-story/ http://skift.com/2014/02/13/airbnb-in-nyc-the-real-numbers-b... that has more explanations...
nobbyclark 13y ago
They are referring to this article on Slate - http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/airbnb_gentrification_how_the_sharing_economy_drives_up_housing_prices.html http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/airb... > If you’re looking for a place to stay in Marfa this evening, there are a total of five options available. In the six year history of Airbnb, only 17 properties have ever been booked in Marfa. So it’s difficult to argue that Airbnb is having any impact on the housing market in this community. Kinda funny reading that then the original article on slate attempting to make something out of this non-story
- crystaln 13y ago
  So you found there to be some reliable information in the Airbnb article? Please extract that here, as I all I found was a bunch of unsupported defensive statements cleverly disguised as scientific conclusions.
- thecosas 13y ago
  Just because the Slate piece IS bunk, it doesn't follow that the airbnb response IS NOT bunk. They're both wrong in how they're presenting the "rightness" of data.
forgingahead 13y ago
Surprised to see them mention NYC in this -- given the legal attention they are facing, it would have been better to not mention the city at all, or any stats about it, so as not to give the critics ammunition (eg: "In their OWN BLOG POST, they admit...")
crystaln 13y ago
PR disguised as science. I like Airbnb in many ways, but these arguements are shallow and wrong. If Airbnb is used to help pay for rent, that necessarily pushes rent upwards. That their research shows Airbnb makes housing "more affordable for families" could only be based on families renting out vacant rooms, something not all families want to do but may be forced to do if Airbnb is widespread. This is Fox News level "science." This article made me slightly queezy.
- _delirium 13y ago
  > If Airbnb is used to help pay for rent, that necessarily pushes rent upwards. I definitely know people who are contemplating getting a bigger place with a spare room specifically to AirBnB it. Besides general effects on the housing market, this can increase people's financial risk (depending other aspects of their finances, such as savings cushion). It amounts to over-provisioning their housing in the hopes of reselling the spare capacity at a profit (you figure you can get more on AirBnB for the 3rd room than the incremental 2rd->3rd room costs you). That can turn out badly if somehow the reselling doesn't work, isn't as profitable as you thought it would be, you end up unable to manage it for a period of time so the extra capacity sites idle, etc. Sort of like buying extra servers in a colo because you figure you can make the money back by renting VPSs at a markup. It can definitely work, but to really make it work you are now in the VPS business, and you might lose money if you aren't good at that business.
  - frandroid 13y ago
    In most rental markets, it's more difficult to find affordable housing for 3BR and 2BR units for families. If more people rent out 2BR and 3BR appartments to rent out the extra room, that's going to put more pressure on families looking for affordable housing.
- geebee 13y ago
  I'm concerned about the effect this could have on family housing in San Francisco. If a family already owns a house and uses airbnb to rent out a downstairs bedroom now and then, sure, I could see that helping. But if a family is in a bidding war with someone without kids, the anticipated income from an airbnb rental could enable the bidder without a child who needs an extra room (to say nothing of the very high costs associated with raising a kid in SD) to go much higher. This would have the effect of making it harder for families to purchase what is currently zoned as single family housing. Now, this is just a concern. It may not currently be happening, and it may be unlikely to happen in the future. According to this post, Ken Rosen, an economist at UC Berkeley, conducted a detailed study for airbnb and states that "...not only is there no evidence to suggest that short-term rentals are making homes less affordable, our research and analysis indicate that home sharing has the potential to make urban housing more affordable for more families." I was unable to find a link to this study on the blog post... is this it? http://urbanland.uli.org/news/short-term-rentals-and-the-housing-market/ http://urbanland.uli.org/news/short-term-rentals-and-the-hou... The only reference I get to a "family" here is "...the amount of income from a rental alone is not generally sufficient to live on, but it can go a long way in providing supplemental income for a family." Sure, but is a family as able to access this supplemental income as someone without kids, and more free bedrooms? And what about the "bidding war" scenario, above? Even if it is not a big factor now, it could become a big factor once the expectation of rental income becomes the norm. The urban land article references this study: http://www.rosenconsulting.com/products/rentalreport.html http://www.rosenconsulting.com/products/rentalreport.html The roseconsulting link makes no reference to families. I recommend people who are interesting read it. The summary is that other factors have led to the rise in housing costs, including restrictive zoning laws and an employment boom, and that airbnb (and related) rentals are too small a part of the rental market to have much of an effect. Does this mean they could have a large effect if it become more widespread?
jmduke 13y ago
So, if I'm reading this right, a bit more than one in eight AirBnB hosts in New York are violating the law? Is that not an issue in of itself?
- chermanowicz 13y ago
  Worse. 2/3rd of listings are or would be violating NY laws: "Two thirds of the listings that contain user reviews are for the “Entire home/apartment” room type (listings without reviews are slightly less, at 64%). Because of a New York State law regarding short-term housing, it is almost always illegal to rent a full apartment when the host is not present for less than 30 days."
  - judk 13y ago
    What does "would be" mean here? Meaning "the listing" may be legal, but the listed arrangement is illegal?
    - chimeracoder 13y ago
      That logic didn't work so well for Craigslist's "erotic services" category, which was shut down after pressure from Richard Blumenthal, the attorney general of Connecticut. (Not that that stopped people from advertising sex work on Craigslist - they're just (slightly) less direct about it).
      - judk 13y ago
        I thought soliciting for sex for money was explicitly illegal, besides the crime of actually sexing for money.
  - potatolicious 13y ago
    This seems to fly in the face of AirBnb's claim: "87% of Airbnb hosts in New York share only the home in which they live." Anecdotally just surfing around what's currently listed - the vast majority of listings are for whole home/apartments, only a minority are shared. IMO there are some major shenanigans going on in AirBnb's numbers. Side note: I hate, HATE, this weasel word, "sharing": "Rosen’s work also examined whether some people would stop renting their apartments to permanent residents and start sharing them only on Airbnb." IT'S CALLED RENTING. AirBnb hosts are "sharing" their apartments to visitors as much as my local restaurant is "sharing" their food with me.
dangerlibrary 13y ago
There's a line: if it becomes more profitable to rent at Airbnb's nightly rates than at monthly / long-term rates, property investors will then drive down long-term housing supply, increasing property values and monthly rents. Airbnb's claim is that there is no evidence suggesting that the line has been crossed, so the only impact of their service is that existing landowners / renters get to line their pockets a bit. They don't have a leg to stand on if you see people successfully investing in property to rent exclusively at short-term rates, which has started to happen in some markets [1][2]. I'm tempted to cheekily link to their own blog post here indicating that 13% of their NYC hosts are doing exactly this. And don't even get me started on the fact that while looking for a place to live, landlords have justified their insane asking rate by telling me that the previous tenant rented out a spare room on Airbnb. 1. http://needwant.com/p/buying-apartment-airbnb/ http://needwant.com/p/buying-apartment-airbnb/ 2. http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/01/20/home-sharing-site-san-francisco-evictions/ http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/01/20/home-sharing-sit...
- chimeracoder 13y ago
  > And don't even get me started on the fact that while looking for a place to live, landlords have justified their insane asking rate by telling me that the previous tenant rented out a spare room on Airbnb. Ah, that's lovely. Coupled with the "no subletting" clause standard in NYC leases, this means that landlords can jack up rent while also giving themselves an easy excuse to terminate your lease at any point in the future when they decide it's convenient (for them) to do so. (If you think this is too sleazy and underhanded to be believable, you've never tried renting an apartment in NYC. There are certainly some great exceptions - my current management co. is great - but I've heard some great horror stories, and experienced one of my own.)
  - lmg643 13y ago
    it's a strange thing to contemplate how a startup like this could directly contribute to housing cost inflation in your own backyard. and to think you might be right - the answer could be you might need to give up some privacy (let strangers have run of your home) to live where you want - wow - that's a bright future we're working with. i'm an apartment dweller myself - i'm going to check with the building management today to see if they ban this kind of short term rental in my building. at least protect myself on my own turf.
rdl 13y ago
I kind of hate when people cherry-pick stats to be misleading, even if I otherwise support them. The relevant number for NYC is not the percentage of hosts sharing a primary residence, but the percentage of total listings in NYC, or percentage of room-nights booked. I'm sure those numbers are far worse than 13%. Anyone renting non-primary residences is probably renting a lot of non-primary residences.
- judk 13y ago
  Does the percentage even matter? You need to weight by cost/benefit, under some releveant model.
- nedwin 13y ago
  Anecdata: I stayed in NY last January with a guy who had 10 different places from Greenpoint to Williamsburg.
- nateabele 13y ago
  Also depends on how they classify 'NYC host'. Last month I rented a place on 1st Ave. that was actually owned by a real estate company in San Diego. The place was fine, but the experience trying to coordinate with them was... not great. They were clearly just jumping on the bandwagon to make a quick buck.
- brianchesky 13y ago
  You are correct that there are some hosts that list multiple properties, thus skewing the listing breakdown. It depends on the city. In most cities, room nights and revenue for "primary dwellings," meaning the homes people live in, are around 70-80%. We are in 34,000 cities, so this really varies quite widely. I would like to see the breakdown to be skewed much closer to primary dwellings for two reasons - (1) they have much higher review scores from guests, and (2) they don't typically enrich cities the way ordinary hosts do (though there are always exceptions. We are actually working with cities and our community to remove corporate rental companies that don't meet the above.
  - rdl 13y ago
bcgraham 13y ago
I don't know how they can argue with a straight face that using short-term rent to pay mortgages and leases doesn't raise the prices of real estate. That extra income is (obviously) going to get factored into real estate prices when someone makes an offer on a property. And the people who are using it now to supplement mortgages are going to use that income as a selling point when they try to sell their property - "gets $XXX/day on short-term rentals." EDIT: typos & minor wording
- sliverstorm 13y ago
  Right. In the very short term, they are helping people, but in the long term it's an economic arms-race. Put in very simple terms, if you make owning a house more affordable, houses will get more expensive to compensate.
- judk 13y ago
  Hacker News stories need an auto-bot-post explaining supply and demand and "seller's market" AMD "buyer's market".
  - stefan_kendall 13y ago
    But my gut feeling tells me that supply and demand have nothing to do with price! It's all greedy landlords and tech elitists trying to evict me out of my home I can't afford.
w1ntermute 13y ago
The solution to this problem is to allow property developers and landowners to freely increase the housing supply. And then start charging land taxes instead of property taxes, to encourage such development.
- camus2 13y ago
  > The solution to this problem is to allow property developers and landowners to freely increase the housing supply. I dont think such a thing will ever be possible. Some big companies in the housing market might even be against it.
_delirium 13y ago
From a purely user point of view I wonder if they could automate this classification and let me use it as a search filter. AirBnB's compelling use-case for me is as a "paid couchsurfing": people renting out spare rooms in their residence, the whole residence while they're temporarily gone, etc. In many cities those are indeed the main kind of result. But in a few cities there are a lot of listings that are more like a commercial operator, depending on the location ranging from "DIY hostel" to VRBO-style listings. I'd rather just exclude those from the search, because I don't find AirBnB to be a very useful portal to that kind of property (most of the legit vacation-rental type stuff have their own websites where you can rent directly, and the "DIY hostel" stuff I'd rather stay away from). As is I have to spend a good bit of time manually trying to filter them out.
nedwin 13y ago
"56% of Airbnb hosts in San Francisco said they use their Airbnb income to help pay their mortgage or rent." If these people didn't use AirBNB they couldn't afford their rent. They'd move out or find a cheaper place. Now they have AirBNB they can afford to pay more rent which raises the market.
- jusben1369 13y ago
  Which is no doubt very true. But this still may be an argument for keeping Airbnb in the bigger picture if you value diversity in your neighborhoods. Any by diversity I mean the ability for many low to mid wage workers to live near their jobs.
  - nedwin 13y ago
    That could be true. The risk is that it prices the low to mid wage workers out with AirBNB not even keeping them in an area. I'd love to see a study on the average income of AirBNB hosts outside of their AirBNB income.
codex 13y ago
This is a great example of the the danger of consuming "raw" corporate propaganda. Without professional journalists to fact-check, look for other perspectives, and filter corporate self-interest, many readers will come out misinformed. Information supply becomes further tainted by attempts to manipulate the average Joe. I really hope the NYTimes and Washington Post don't go out of business; I rely on them to adjudicate most of my news.
- sethhochberg 13y ago
  Agreed - especially given the popularity of sites like the Tampa Bay Times' politifact.com, I hope we'll continue to see newspapers take advantage of their fact-checkers and editorial teams outside (and inside) of their own publications. It might be a great way for those organizations to stay relevant - sort of like "Snopes for the real world".
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
jusben1369 13y ago
Boy that Slate article is just bad. So one sided. Airbnb is absolutely disrupting the home ownership/rental and hotel markets. Like any market there might be winners and losers. It will sort itself out though and we'll settle at a new balance.
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
codex 13y ago
Hotels are a form of progressive taxation: rich out of town travelers pay more for housing than permanent residents. Generally travelers are richer than non travelers because traveling is usually a discretionary expense or paid for by a corporation. AirBnb eliminates the progressive taxation, thereby raising living expenses for poorer residents. Rich people love it, poor people hate it. Sure, you can make some money in the short term by renting out your spare room, but in the long term, as rents rise, this process involuntarily turns your two bedroom apartment into a one bedroom + strangers' room apartment. Just wait until San Francisco "Google bus activists" get a whiff of AirBnb.
vdaniuk 13y ago
So, HN community in these threads is against of Airbnb because it pushes up the prices of housing in desirable cities/city regions. Did I get it right? What's so bad about that?
- brianchesky 13y ago
  There isn't actually evidence that this occurs that I am aware of.

39 points by lennysan 13y ago

sneak 13y ago

I am really tired of these "oh shit we have to issue a PR spin control response" posts that presume I've already read the original drama and don't link to it. "You might have seen a story" my ass. Link to something if you're going to respond to it.

brianchesky 13y ago
You're right; we should have linked to it. I'm changing that now.
- gamblor956 13y ago
  Are you also planning on addressing the numerous factual misrepresentations in the post? Because your [edit:AirBnB's (Brian is CEO is AirBNB)] already poor credibility is taking a real beating: see pretty much all of the comments on this page.
  - calbear81 13y ago
    Methinks a smart person would listen to their lawyer and not make any claims on this or any other public forum while embroiled in an active lawsuit.
  - brianchesky 13y ago
    I am not aware of any factual misrepresentations, but I am working my way through some of the comments.
- brianchesky 13y ago
  Here is the link so you don't have to go back to the story: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/airbnb_gentrification_how_the_sharing_economy_drives_up_housing_prices.html http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/airb...

alcari 13y ago

> 87% of Airbnb hosts in New York share only the home in which they live Does this mean they're admitting that 13% of Airbnb hosts in New York are sharing other properties? I was under the impression that Airbnb strongly denied such people existed.

mjolk 13y ago
That's kind of crazy -- more than one out of ten is an illegal hotel as per their own statistics.
ironchef 13y ago
There was something mentioned here: http://skift.com/2014/02/13/airbnb-in-nyc-the-real-numbers-behind-the-sharing-story/ http://skift.com/2014/02/13/airbnb-in-nyc-the-real-numbers-b... that has more explanations...

nobbyclark 13y ago

They are referring to this article on Slate - http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/airbnb_gentrification_how_the_sharing_economy_drives_up_housing_prices.html http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/airb... > If you’re looking for a place to stay in Marfa this evening, there are a total of five options available. In the six year history of Airbnb, only 17 properties have ever been booked in Marfa. So it’s difficult to argue that Airbnb is having any impact on the housing market in this community. Kinda funny reading that then the original article on slate attempting to make something out of this non-story

crystaln 13y ago
So you found there to be some reliable information in the Airbnb article? Please extract that here, as I all I found was a bunch of unsupported defensive statements cleverly disguised as scientific conclusions.
thecosas 13y ago
Just because the Slate piece IS bunk, it doesn't follow that the airbnb response IS NOT bunk. They're both wrong in how they're presenting the "rightness" of data.

forgingahead 13y ago

Surprised to see them mention NYC in this -- given the legal attention they are facing, it would have been better to not mention the city at all, or any stats about it, so as not to give the critics ammunition (eg: "In their OWN BLOG POST, they admit...")

crystaln 13y ago

PR disguised as science. I like Airbnb in many ways, but these arguements are shallow and wrong. If Airbnb is used to help pay for rent, that necessarily pushes rent upwards. That their research shows Airbnb makes housing "more affordable for families" could only be based on families renting out vacant rooms, something not all families want to do but may be forced to do if Airbnb is widespread. This is Fox News level "science." This article made me slightly queezy.

_delirium 13y ago
> If Airbnb is used to help pay for rent, that necessarily pushes rent upwards. I definitely know people who are contemplating getting a bigger place with a spare room specifically to AirBnB it. Besides general effects on the housing market, this can increase people's financial risk (depending other aspects of their finances, such as savings cushion). It amounts to over-provisioning their housing in the hopes of reselling the spare capacity at a profit (you figure you can get more on AirBnB for the 3rd room than the incremental 2rd->3rd room costs you). That can turn out badly if somehow the reselling doesn't work, isn't as profitable as you thought it would be, you end up unable to manage it for a period of time so the extra capacity sites idle, etc. Sort of like buying extra servers in a colo because you figure you can make the money back by renting VPSs at a markup. It can definitely work, but to really make it work you are now in the VPS business, and you might lose money if you aren't good at that business.
- frandroid 13y ago
  In most rental markets, it's more difficult to find affordable housing for 3BR and 2BR units for families. If more people rent out 2BR and 3BR appartments to rent out the extra room, that's going to put more pressure on families looking for affordable housing.
geebee 13y ago
I'm concerned about the effect this could have on family housing in San Francisco. If a family already owns a house and uses airbnb to rent out a downstairs bedroom now and then, sure, I could see that helping. But if a family is in a bidding war with someone without kids, the anticipated income from an airbnb rental could enable the bidder without a child who needs an extra room (to say nothing of the very high costs associated with raising a kid in SD) to go much higher. This would have the effect of making it harder for families to purchase what is currently zoned as single family housing. Now, this is just a concern. It may not currently be happening, and it may be unlikely to happen in the future. According to this post, Ken Rosen, an economist at UC Berkeley, conducted a detailed study for airbnb and states that "...not only is there no evidence to suggest that short-term rentals are making homes less affordable, our research and analysis indicate that home sharing has the potential to make urban housing more affordable for more families." I was unable to find a link to this study on the blog post... is this it? http://urbanland.uli.org/news/short-term-rentals-and-the-housing-market/ http://urbanland.uli.org/news/short-term-rentals-and-the-hou... The only reference I get to a "family" here is "...the amount of income from a rental alone is not generally sufficient to live on, but it can go a long way in providing supplemental income for a family." Sure, but is a family as able to access this supplemental income as someone without kids, and more free bedrooms? And what about the "bidding war" scenario, above? Even if it is not a big factor now, it could become a big factor once the expectation of rental income becomes the norm. The urban land article references this study: http://www.rosenconsulting.com/products/rentalreport.html http://www.rosenconsulting.com/products/rentalreport.html The roseconsulting link makes no reference to families. I recommend people who are interesting read it. The summary is that other factors have led to the rise in housing costs, including restrictive zoning laws and an employment boom, and that airbnb (and related) rentals are too small a part of the rental market to have much of an effect. Does this mean they could have a large effect if it become more widespread?

jmduke 13y ago

So, if I'm reading this right, a bit more than one in eight AirBnB hosts in New York are violating the law? Is that not an issue in of itself?

chermanowicz 13y ago
Worse. 2/3rd of listings are or would be violating NY laws: "Two thirds of the listings that contain user reviews are for the “Entire home/apartment” room type (listings without reviews are slightly less, at 64%). Because of a New York State law regarding short-term housing, it is almost always illegal to rent a full apartment when the host is not present for less than 30 days."
- judk 13y ago
  What does "would be" mean here? Meaning "the listing" may be legal, but the listed arrangement is illegal?
  - chimeracoder 13y ago
    That logic didn't work so well for Craigslist's "erotic services" category, which was shut down after pressure from Richard Blumenthal, the attorney general of Connecticut. (Not that that stopped people from advertising sex work on Craigslist - they're just (slightly) less direct about it).
    - judk 13y ago
      I thought soliciting for sex for money was explicitly illegal, besides the crime of actually sexing for money.
- potatolicious 13y ago
  This seems to fly in the face of AirBnb's claim: "87% of Airbnb hosts in New York share only the home in which they live." Anecdotally just surfing around what's currently listed - the vast majority of listings are for whole home/apartments, only a minority are shared. IMO there are some major shenanigans going on in AirBnb's numbers. Side note: I hate, HATE, this weasel word, "sharing": "Rosen’s work also examined whether some people would stop renting their apartments to permanent residents and start sharing them only on Airbnb." IT'S CALLED RENTING. AirBnb hosts are "sharing" their apartments to visitors as much as my local restaurant is "sharing" their food with me.

dangerlibrary 13y ago

There's a line: if it becomes more profitable to rent at Airbnb's nightly rates than at monthly / long-term rates, property investors will then drive down long-term housing supply, increasing property values and monthly rents. Airbnb's claim is that there is no evidence suggesting that the line has been crossed, so the only impact of their service is that existing landowners / renters get to line their pockets a bit. They don't have a leg to stand on if you see people successfully investing in property to rent exclusively at short-term rates, which has started to happen in some markets [1][2]. I'm tempted to cheekily link to their own blog post here indicating that 13% of their NYC hosts are doing exactly this. And don't even get me started on the fact that while looking for a place to live, landlords have justified their insane asking rate by telling me that the previous tenant rented out a spare room on Airbnb. 1. http://needwant.com/p/buying-apartment-airbnb/ http://needwant.com/p/buying-apartment-airbnb/ 2. http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/01/20/home-sharing-site-san-francisco-evictions/ http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/01/20/home-sharing-sit...

chimeracoder 13y ago
> And don't even get me started on the fact that while looking for a place to live, landlords have justified their insane asking rate by telling me that the previous tenant rented out a spare room on Airbnb. Ah, that's lovely. Coupled with the "no subletting" clause standard in NYC leases, this means that landlords can jack up rent while also giving themselves an easy excuse to terminate your lease at any point in the future when they decide it's convenient (for them) to do so. (If you think this is too sleazy and underhanded to be believable, you've never tried renting an apartment in NYC. There are certainly some great exceptions - my current management co. is great - but I've heard some great horror stories, and experienced one of my own.)
- lmg643 13y ago
  it's a strange thing to contemplate how a startup like this could directly contribute to housing cost inflation in your own backyard. and to think you might be right - the answer could be you might need to give up some privacy (let strangers have run of your home) to live where you want - wow - that's a bright future we're working with. i'm an apartment dweller myself - i'm going to check with the building management today to see if they ban this kind of short term rental in my building. at least protect myself on my own turf.

rdl 13y ago

I kind of hate when people cherry-pick stats to be misleading, even if I otherwise support them. The relevant number for NYC is not the percentage of hosts sharing a primary residence, but the percentage of total listings in NYC, or percentage of room-nights booked. I'm sure those numbers are far worse than 13%. Anyone renting non-primary residences is probably renting a lot of non-primary residences.

judk 13y ago
Does the percentage even matter? You need to weight by cost/benefit, under some releveant model.
nedwin 13y ago
Anecdata: I stayed in NY last January with a guy who had 10 different places from Greenpoint to Williamsburg.
nateabele 13y ago
Also depends on how they classify 'NYC host'. Last month I rented a place on 1st Ave. that was actually owned by a real estate company in San Diego. The place was fine, but the experience trying to coordinate with them was... not great. They were clearly just jumping on the bandwagon to make a quick buck.
brianchesky 13y ago
You are correct that there are some hosts that list multiple properties, thus skewing the listing breakdown. It depends on the city. In most cities, room nights and revenue for "primary dwellings," meaning the homes people live in, are around 70-80%. We are in 34,000 cities, so this really varies quite widely. I would like to see the breakdown to be skewed much closer to primary dwellings for two reasons - (1) they have much higher review scores from guests, and (2) they don't typically enrich cities the way ordinary hosts do (though there are always exceptions. We are actually working with cities and our community to remove corporate rental companies that don't meet the above.
- rdl 13y ago

bcgraham 13y ago

I don't know how they can argue with a straight face that using short-term rent to pay mortgages and leases doesn't raise the prices of real estate. That extra income is (obviously) going to get factored into real estate prices when someone makes an offer on a property. And the people who are using it now to supplement mortgages are going to use that income as a selling point when they try to sell their property - "gets $XXX/day on short-term rentals." EDIT: typos & minor wording

sliverstorm 13y ago
Right. In the very short term, they are helping people, but in the long term it's an economic arms-race. Put in very simple terms, if you make owning a house more affordable, houses will get more expensive to compensate.
judk 13y ago
Hacker News stories need an auto-bot-post explaining supply and demand and "seller's market" AMD "buyer's market".
- stefan_kendall 13y ago
  But my gut feeling tells me that supply and demand have nothing to do with price! It's all greedy landlords and tech elitists trying to evict me out of my home I can't afford.

w1ntermute 13y ago

The solution to this problem is to allow property developers and landowners to freely increase the housing supply. And then start charging land taxes instead of property taxes, to encourage such development.

camus2 13y ago
> The solution to this problem is to allow property developers and landowners to freely increase the housing supply. I dont think such a thing will ever be possible. Some big companies in the housing market might even be against it.

_delirium 13y ago

From a purely user point of view I wonder if they could automate this classification and let me use it as a search filter. AirBnB's compelling use-case for me is as a "paid couchsurfing": people renting out spare rooms in their residence, the whole residence while they're temporarily gone, etc. In many cities those are indeed the main kind of result. But in a few cities there are a lot of listings that are more like a commercial operator, depending on the location ranging from "DIY hostel" to VRBO-style listings. I'd rather just exclude those from the search, because I don't find AirBnB to be a very useful portal to that kind of property (most of the legit vacation-rental type stuff have their own websites where you can rent directly, and the "DIY hostel" stuff I'd rather stay away from). As is I have to spend a good bit of time manually trying to filter them out.

nedwin 13y ago

"56% of Airbnb hosts in San Francisco said they use their Airbnb income to help pay their mortgage or rent." If these people didn't use AirBNB they couldn't afford their rent. They'd move out or find a cheaper place. Now they have AirBNB they can afford to pay more rent which raises the market.

jusben1369 13y ago
Which is no doubt very true. But this still may be an argument for keeping Airbnb in the bigger picture if you value diversity in your neighborhoods. Any by diversity I mean the ability for many low to mid wage workers to live near their jobs.
- nedwin 13y ago
  That could be true. The risk is that it prices the low to mid wage workers out with AirBNB not even keeping them in an area. I'd love to see a study on the average income of AirBNB hosts outside of their AirBNB income.

codex 13y ago

This is a great example of the the danger of consuming "raw" corporate propaganda. Without professional journalists to fact-check, look for other perspectives, and filter corporate self-interest, many readers will come out misinformed. Information supply becomes further tainted by attempts to manipulate the average Joe. I really hope the NYTimes and Washington Post don't go out of business; I rely on them to adjudicate most of my news.

sethhochberg 13y ago
Agreed - especially given the popularity of sites like the Tampa Bay Times' politifact.com, I hope we'll continue to see newspapers take advantage of their fact-checkers and editorial teams outside (and inside) of their own publications. It might be a great way for those organizations to stay relevant - sort of like "Snopes for the real world".

deleted 13y ago

[deleted]

jusben1369 13y ago

Boy that Slate article is just bad. So one sided. Airbnb is absolutely disrupting the home ownership/rental and hotel markets. Like any market there might be winners and losers. It will sort itself out though and we'll settle at a new balance.

deleted 13y ago
[deleted]

codex 13y ago

Hotels are a form of progressive taxation: rich out of town travelers pay more for housing than permanent residents. Generally travelers are richer than non travelers because traveling is usually a discretionary expense or paid for by a corporation. AirBnb eliminates the progressive taxation, thereby raising living expenses for poorer residents. Rich people love it, poor people hate it. Sure, you can make some money in the short term by renting out your spare room, but in the long term, as rents rise, this process involuntarily turns your two bedroom apartment into a one bedroom + strangers' room apartment. Just wait until San Francisco "Google bus activists" get a whiff of AirBnb.

vdaniuk 13y ago

So, HN community in these threads is against of Airbnb because it pushes up the prices of housing in desirable cities/city regions. Did I get it right? What's so bad about that?

brianchesky 13y ago
There isn't actually evidence that this occurs that I am aware of.