5 ms·

I didn't mean to belittle it all, I'm well impressed with it. Nicely explained for the most part and I saw afterwards that it's up on github too so it's easy to

I didn't mean to belittle it all, I'm well impressed with it. Nicely explained for the most part and I saw afterwards that it's up on github too so it's easy to send in corrections for it. I had to look up Friendica and Movim to see what they were (I'd never heard of them before), it'd be nice to have links to the respective homepages, so off I'll go and add them in.

motters 13y ago
Pull requests for corrections or installation sequences are welcome.
- mikegriff 13y ago
  No problems, I can see one or two bits that I think could do with clarifying (not least to get rid of emacs :P ). I'll have a go at it this evening and take notes.
  - motters 13y ago
    The particular editor isn't all that important. You could just use nano or vi. I don't think any of the instructions contain anything really Emacs specific. I happen to use Emacs and the source for the site is an org-mode document, which makes editing it very easy. Exporting it as HTML is a few key presses.
    - eliasmacpherson 13y ago
      As a vi user, i'd be willing to leave the great war to one side and give nano the thumbs up, many people not used to the console struggle to quit out of vi or emacs while being competent with sublime text or notepad++. nano works better for them.
    - mikegriff 13y ago
      Only messing. I just couldn't resist bringing up the great editor debate :)