6 ms·
"No. The output might be beautiful, but the language is most certainly not. Awful to debug." Absolutely agree but, as far as I'm aware, this "more modern alter
by ghswa 13y ago
"No. The output might be beautiful, but the language is most certainly not. Awful to debug."
Absolutely agree but, as far as I'm aware, this "more modern alternative" does not exist.
- nas 13y agoLout is quite a bit saner but doesn't have much traction. It seems to be in "deep maintenance" mode now.
- vmarsy 13y agoWhat about this ? http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/ http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/ Having some XML output seems to make it easier to add CSS rules ?
- SeanLuke 13y agoCombines the complexity of LaTeX with the hideousness of XML. Great.
- andolanra 13y agoThere's Patoline[^1], which is still in a somewhat early state, and its language is quite LaTeX-ish. [^1]: http://patoline.com/index.html http://patoline.com/index.html