6 ms·
I find the title kind of ironic, given that sweet.js is still a compiler. :P However, it is true it would be better to have one standard-ish compiler that can
by Fishrock123 13y ago
I find the title kind of ironic, given that sweet.js is still a compiler. :P
However, it is true it would be better to have one standard-ish compiler that can just execute whichever macros you throw into it.
That being said, you still run into the issue that `sync` brought up.