7 ms·
That's a question, not an argument. Here's another question: "How can a human being, which consists of many neurons, each of which has limited agency over the
by DigitalTurk 13y ago
That's a question, not an argument.
Here's another question: "How can a human being, which consists of many neurons, each of which has limited agency over the aggregate actions of that entity, be remotely capable of demonstrating moral agency?"
Incidentally, I noticed that you substituted 'human-like moral agency' for 'moral agency' in the OP. I never said states have human-like moral agency (nor am I making a claim to the contrary per se).
- XorNot 13y agoNo it's a rhetorical question, turn it into one with an answer and you'd have rebutted the argument. You might also note that the answer to your question is that they don't. It is a problem applicable at scale - and we do terrible things to single neurons all the time in the name of science.
- DigitalTurk 13y agoMy question wasn't whether neurons have agency. It was whether people have agency. Also, I intended 'limited agency' to be read as 'zero or very little agency'.