8 ms·
http://www.lscp.net/persons/ramus/fr/GDP1/papers/spencer99.pdf http://www.lscp.net/persons/ramus/fr/GDP1/papers/spencer99.p... “Characterizing the test as inse
by 0x20 13y ago
http://www.lscp.net/persons/ramus/fr/GDP1/papers/spencer99.pdf http://www.lscp.net/persons/ramus/fr/GDP1/papers/spencer99.p...
“Characterizing the test as insensitive to gender differences was enough to totally eliminate women’s underperformance in this experiment. Yet when the same test was characterized as sensitive to gender differences, women significantly underperformed in relation to equally qualified men.”
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15298868.2012.687012#.Ueuwoo3FV8E http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15298868.2012.68...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19487665 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19487665
- newnewnew 13y agoSome social scientists are skeptical of the validity of stereotype threat. John List, in a paper coauthored with Steven Levitt at the University of Chicago, was unable to reproduce it[1]. Some scholars suspect publication bias[2]. Also see another failure to reproduce by the Educational Testing Service[3]. [1] http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/10/john-list-on-virtual-nonexistence-of.html http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/10/john-list-on-virtual-none... [2] http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/01/stereotype-threat-scientific-scandal.html http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/01/stereotype-threat-scienti... [3] http://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/11/high-stakes-stereotype-threat.html http://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/11/high-stakes-stereotype-th...