Here’s a lovely bit of nasty hypocrisy: "Yoga International could keep the videos on its website until it had a chance to re-film the classes using a different

Here’s a lovely bit of nasty hypocrisy: "Yoga International could keep the videos on its website until it had a chance to re-film the classes using a different style." So they say they're not using the patent as a weapon, but then describe themselves harassing another organization with it. Their patience is generous only if we can assume it's no trouble at all to re-film those classes (ugh). And doesn't the existence of videos they "felt were very close to ours" imply a bit of prior art and/or lack of originality on the so-called patented style? Or perhaps are they are insinuating that Yoga International willfully "stole" or "reverse engineered" their style before the patent was issued?