8 ms·
http://www.uspto.gov/patents/stats/Reexamination_Information.jsp http://www.uspto.gov/patents/stats/Reexamination_Information... "Filing Compliant Reexaminatio
by t0dd 13y ago
http://www.uspto.gov/patents/stats/Reexamination_Information.jsp http://www.uspto.gov/patents/stats/Reexamination_Information...
"Filing Compliant Reexamination Requests"
http://www.uspto.gov/patents/Best_Practices_and_FAQs_for_filing_reexaminations_5_10_10.pdf http://www.uspto.gov/patents/Best_Practices_and_FAQs_for_fil...
- toomuchtodo 13y agoThanks, I'll file the request Monday.
- t0dd 13y agoNo problem. I am as well. I believe you need to include prior art with the re-examination request. I will be submitting yoga videos, at least from the 90s, such as (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUgtMaAZzW0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUgtMaAZzW0) that certainly raise questions whether the patent is valid or not.
- toomuchtodo 13y agoI'm being told a patent reexamination fee is $6000: http://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/5587/method-to-request-reexamination-of-patent-for-instructional-video?noredirect=1#comment3240_5587 http://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/5587/method-to-re... Is this accurate?
- jsmeaton 13y agoWhat about any kind of exercise video that's filmed as if someone is virtually in the class? I can't believe this kind of thing can be patentable AT ALL, but the next worst thing is substituting [Yoga] for [X] a hundred times and also patenting those. Frivolous, bullshit patents.
- TrevorJ 13y agoThe problem is, aren't they saying that the patent only covers streaming videos with the same mise-en-scene?