6 ms·
Presumably his contract prevents him from discussing internal issues with any outside party. (Knowledge source: Got totally screwed by a business partner via l
by binarysolo 13y ago
Presumably his contract prevents him from discussing internal issues with any outside party.
(Knowledge source: Got totally screwed by a business partner via legalese and had all my work stolen, ended up doing half a year of work uncompensated, can't legally talk about it or the partner, and loss < cost of litigation. Ah well, water under bridge.)
- georgemcbay 13y agoWell a big part of this whole problem is that he had no contract to begin with ("We never signed any contracts or work-for-hire agreements"). That aside, he works as a freelancer in an industry where naming and shaming specific agencies could very well hinder his ability to get future work, so I don't blame him for not doing it.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- vacri 13y agoProbably more to do with him already taking content down to avoid their litigation - avoiding naming them looks like it follows on from that.
- tsieling 13y agoThe article says no contract was signed.