7 ms·
This is cool. But should the fourth section (sub-seconds) be running from 0-99? It is currently running from 0-59, too. Sorry about the nitpick; this really is
by raganesh 13y ago
This is cool. But should the fourth section (sub-seconds) be running from 0-99? It is currently running from 0-59, too.
Sorry about the nitpick; this really is a cool implementation :-)
- paullaros 13y agoUpdated! Thanks for your feedback.