6 ms·
I completely understand - this was one of our major concerns when we were deciding whether or not we should count redirects. If you look at the function increm
by jhaimson 13y ago
I completely understand - this was one of our major concerns when we were deciding whether or not we should count redirects. If you look at the function incrementCounter() in the code (https://github.com/Jdhaimson/smilealways/blob/master/chromeplugin/request.js https://github.com/Jdhaimson/smilealways/blob/master/chromep...) you can see that all we are doing is pinging the server without passing any information along to increment a counter each time someone is redirected.
That being said, I think I will take it off of the site because it can be scary if you don't look at the code. Thanks for the suggestion!
- mrigor 13y agoWithout rate limiting it looks be to susceptible to abuse.
- jhaimson 13y agoYeah, I realize this method is open to abuse. I just figured that the counter really was more of a "nice-to-have" so I can see how many times it was working, but if someone really wanted to abuse it than it wouldn't be that big of an issue. I'd have an incorrect count, but that's about it. At the end of the day, it wasn't worth spending the initial effort to build against that. I intend on doing this in the future, but for now I'm willing to accept the risk of having an incorrect redirect count and get it out to more people in the meantime.