6 ms·
I agree that the title is linkbait, which is unfortunate since the content is interesting enough to not need it. Why are those things people should care about?
by Bsharp 13y ago
I agree that the title is linkbait, which is unfortunate since the content is interesting enough to not need it.
Why are those things people should care about? I understand that knowing these things means you have a less-skewed view of the world, but I don't think it's unreasonable that Average Joe doesn't know the world life expectancy or the population distribution. To most people these metrics are just interesting curiosities and nothing more - they have other things to care about, so naturally something like this falls by the wayside. I feel like the article is unfairly criticizing people for not being informed.
I think it would be more interesting if someone gave this to 1,000 leading politicians, who should be much more knowledgeable about this stuff but I suspect would only do somewhat better, if at all. (Disclaimer: making that up.)
- vidarh 13y agoThe problem is not so much when people don't know, but that people often do pick up misinformation, and let that influence choices such as who they vote for, and what views they hold, rather than admit they don't know and go look something up.